Category: Pet Health


 

treats

Thursday, October 24, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles…)

(NaturalNews) Thousands of family dogs across the USA have been sickened by pet jerky treats made in China, and nearly 600 dogs have died. The FDA has issued a warning over the deadly jerky treats but has not forced any sort of product recall.

So far, the cause of the fatalities remains a mystery. The FDA says it has tested jerky treats for heavy metals, pesticides, antibiotics, chemicals and even Salmonella but cannot find the cause. The agency is warning pet owners to watch their pets for symptoms of poisoning which may include “decreased appetite, decreased activity, vomiting, diarrhea (sometimes with blood or mucus), increased water consumption and / or increased urination.”

Click here to view the FDA’s fact sheet on contaminated jerky treats.

According to USA Today, the deadly jerky treats “come mostly from China,” and the number of dogs sickened or killed by these treats has been rising all year.

The treats causing this epidemic of death, says USA Today, are “made of chicken, duck, sweet potatoes or dried fruit.”

Beware of pet treats made in China

Most consumers do not fully realize that pet treats do NOT have to list their country of origin. Many pet treats are highly deceptive on their packaging, sometimes showing a logo of the continental USA and claiming to be “made with beef from the USA” even though the treats themselves are manufactured in China using toxic chemicals.

The FDA has not issued a recall on the brands it suspects are causing these deaths. This is one of the problems with the agency: it already knows which products are killing dogs, but it has so far failed to release that information to the public. As a result, as more and more people learn about this, all pet treat manufacturers will suffer because consumers will shun the entire product category.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Reblogged from  :    FSP-Microcosm News-Global Community Report

 photo StemcelltransplantperformedonBremertondog_zps0209ed5f.jpg

Sitting in the waiting room Thursday morning, the minutes crept by for Kat Schoettle.

“It will be a long day,” she said.

A dear loved one was undergoing a stem cell transplant.

“I’m a little nervous,” said Schoettle.

The patient on the operating table was only 10 months old. His name: Ralph.

“He’s family,” said Schoettle, with a sigh, wringing her hands.

Ralph has a degenerative condition in his leg. It’s essentially rotting from the inside and would one day need to be amputated.

Ralph is also a pug.

 

Watch Video Here

Reblogged from  :    FSP-Microcosm News-Global Community Report

/newmedia/mcp/osunch/2013/jun13/horseskingraph/8-Images/1-Photos/02_Northstar_wide.jpg
Doctors monitor Northstar`s progress
Dr. Samuel Hurcombe, BVMS is one of many experts keeping an eye on Northstar`s treatment. Doctors at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center are using burn techniques typically used on humans to treat the horse.

 

American Paint Horse Was Victim of Animal Abuse

COLUMBUS, Ohio – The unlikely pairing of an equine veterinarian and a burn surgeon is providing a second chance at a normal life for a horse that was doused in flammable liquid and set on fire late last summer.

The Ohio State University doctors and their teams have partnered to perform two skin graft procedures on the American Paint Horse named Northstar, who suffered severe burns to almost half of his body when the abuse occurred.

The same instruments used in a typical human burn surgery were used for the horse’s grafting procedures. The clinicians removed ultrathin sheets of skin from Northstar’s chest and expanded them with a meshing tool before placing the grafts across an enormous wound spanning the horse’s back.

Samuel Hurcombe
Samuel Hurcombe

When he arrived in Columbus on Sept. 5, Northstar had exposed bone at the base of his neck as a result of the burns. Skin damage extended from his neck to the base of his tail and along both of his sides. No suspect has been identified in the case.

 

 

Read More  and  Watch Video Here


By Dr. Becker

Today I have a very special guest, Dr. Jean Hofve. We’re speaking rather urgently via Skype about yet another misguided resolution the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) is putting to a vote this Saturday (yes, tomorrow).

As some of you may recall, the AVMA recently passed a resolution discouraging raw diets for pets. This latest resolution is intended to discourage the use of homeopathy in veterinary medicine.

In case you’re not familiar with Dr. Jean, she’s a retired holistic veterinarian who co-authored The Complete Guide to Holistic Cat Care: An Illustrated Handbook, With Celeste Yarnell. She has also written hundreds of articles, lectured throughout the U.S., and appeared on TV and radio stations around the world. Dr. Jean’s website, Little Big Cat, has a wealth of information on feline health, nutrition and behavior. She currently lives in Denver with four kitties: Flynn, Puzzle, Sundance and Spencer.

Anti-Homeopathy Resolution Slipped in Through the Back Door

Dr. Jean has written a blog post on her website everyone needs to read concerning the proposed AVMA anti-homeopathy resolution.

The AVMA is basing its position solely on a 32-page white paper titled “The Case Against Homeopathy” that states homeopathy is ineffective and its use should be discouraged. According to Dr. Jean’s sources, the white paper was written by a vocal opponent of holistic medicine in all its forms, and was submitted to the AVMA under the sponsorship of the Connecticut Veterinary Medical Association (VMA).

The anti-homeopathy resolution is shocking not only to veterinary homeopaths around the world, but also, hopefully, to every veterinarian in Connecticut, holistic or otherwise. Apparently, the veterinary community in that state was not asked for their input on the resolution!

According to Dr. Jean, the resolution came to the AVMA’s attention through a “weird little procedural back door.” It’s Dr. Jean’s understanding that it will be voted on by the AVMA Executive Board on Saturday, and then go to the House of Delegates (HOD). The normal procedure for these resolutions is that they come up through the HOD or standing committees first, and are then referred to the Executive Board. At the annual conference in July, everyone gets an opportunity to talk about them, and they are voted on by the entire House of Delegates. There are over 100 delegates from 50 states and allied associations. They usually go along with the recommendation of the Executive Board.

This is concerning for the precedent it could set in getting AVMA resolutions passed without expert testimony (in this case, the testimony of veterinary homeopaths and other subject experts), and indeed, without the majority of AVMA’s voting membership made aware of proposed resolutions. (Proposed resolutions are published in JAVMA just prior to the conference. I suspect not many vets read them.)

Who, Exactly, is Behind the Resolution?

I asked Dr. Jean to elaborate if possible on just who is behind the anti-homeopathy white paper upon which the AVMA based its resolution. What are this person’s credentials regarding the practice of veterinary homeopathy?

Dr. Jean responded there is one primary driver behind this information, among a small group of “skeptics” who are dedicated to abolishing complementary and alternative veterinary medicine. This individual apparently pushed to bring it to the AVMA for a vote, but while Dr. Jean knows who the person is, she must respect his privacy because he published the white paper anonymously.

Dr. Jean then pointed out, and I certainly agree, that if a person isn’t proud enough of his work to put his name on it, that fact alone should raise red flags for anyone who is using that work as the sole basis for passing such an important resolution.

A white paper is intended to be an unbiased, “just the facts, ma’am” type of document. In this case, it is completely biased and comes only from the anonymous author’s point of view. He cherry-picked the data he used to the point it is essentially meaningless. And as far as Dr. Jean is concerned, the white paper is full of innuendos and attempts to slide around the truth … bending and twisting it every which-way.

What’s really frustrating is this supposedly unbiased white paper is full of biased information, is authored by a person who apparently didn’t feel comfortable putting his name to it, and who did not consult with a single veterinary homeopath or other expert in homeopathy for the purpose of presenting a balanced approach to the topic.

Why Didn’t the AVMA Solicit Input on the Resolution from Veterinary Homeopaths?

Dr. Jean further pointed out that when the AVMA was presented with the anti-homeopathy resolution and the anonymously authored white paper, it could not be bothered to get the other side of the story. Astonishingly, the AVMA didn’t contact either the AHVMA or the AVH (Academy of Veterinary Homeopathy) for input.

(Just so we’re clear, the AVMA is the professional association most DVMs in the U.S. are affiliated with, regardless of their practice philosophy – traditional/conventional, integrative, holistic, etc. Then there’s the American Holistic Veterinary Medical Association (AHVMA), which is for DVMs who also or exclusively practice holistic veterinary medicine. Under the holistic umbrella are various associations for DVMs who practice specific alternative/complementary therapies like homeopathy, chiropractic, acupuncture, Traditional Chinese Medicine, etc.)

Fortunately, and for whatever good it may do, the AHVMA and the AVH were on high alert based on some other things that have gone on recently. So they got wind early of the AVMA anti-homeopathy resolution and were able to respond. (You can find the AHVMA’s response here.) According to Dr. Jean, this has been going on for a month or two behind the scenes, which is why she was able to dig into the white paper, study the so-called “science” behind it, and write her own excellent response, which you can find here.

A Dangerous Trend

The Connecticut VMA has already passed a resolution discouraging the use of homeopathy, and the resolution now sits with the AVMA. I asked Dr. Jean what we can expect if it passes, which we anticipate it will. Where will people seeking professional homeopathic guidance for their pets turn?

Dr. Jean responded that vets who are currently using homeopathy aren’t going to stop, and pet owners who seek it out will still be able to find it. But what the resolution, if passed, will do in a broader sense is give traditional vets an excuse to refuse to even consider homeopathy – because it has now been “proven” (via the AVMA resolution) to be ineffective, or worse. Practitioners who previously knew nothing about homeopathy will now know only false things about homeopathy.

I liken this to the recently passed AVMA resolution against raw pet food diets. For Dr. Jean and I, and all DVMs who understand species-appropriate nutrition, this is just absurd. It’s like banning wolves from hunting rabbits because they could become sick. Since that ill-advised resolution passed, and now this anti-homeopathy resolution seems destined to pass as well, we seem to be on a slippery slope.

Is the AVMA Being Co-opted?

As Dr. Jean sees it, the AVMA is being co-opted by a small group of “anti-everything” people in the veterinary community who want to kill alternative medicine completely. First, raw food diets. Now, homeopathy. Next could be acupuncture, and on and on.

Dr. Jean mentioned that at the last AVMA conference, all the complementary and alternative medicine lectures were turned over to people who do not believe in most or all complementary and alternative therapies, so it does seem as though the AVMA has been taken over. And that’s very concerning, because the AVMA has a lot of influence with veterinary practitioners in every community across the U.S.

So traditional veterinarians up and down Main Street USA who know nothing about alternative therapies are being given “permission” to make judgments against, in this example, raw feeding and homeopathy, based on the professional recommendations of their governing veterinary organizations.

This has the potential to deny veterinary clients and their pets access to therapies that could be preventive or curative. It also has the potential, in a “Big Brother” sort of way, to severely limit the ability of holistic and integrative vets to practice the kind of medicine they wish to practice — and have been trained and certified to practice.

It’s a scary, concerning and frustrating trend. And as Dr. Jean rightfully pointed out, these AVMA resolutions will discourage veterinarians who are interested in learning alternative modalities from pursuing the appropriate training and education. Ultimately, complementary and alternative veterinary medicine could fade away entirely, which is exactly what the “anti-everything” crowd is hoping for.

What You Can Do … TODAY

I asked Dr. Jean what she thinks pet owners who want alternative therapies to remain available should do in light of the recent AVMA resolutions.

She thinks people should contact the AVMA. Public outcry did do a little good in the anti-raw pet food battle, though a revised resolution ultimately passed. Dr. Jean thinks the AVMA would be very surprised to get an earful from pet owners on the proposed anti-homeopathy resolution as well. And she encourages pet owners to tell the AVMA their stories, if applicable, about the benefits their dog, cat or other companion animal has received from alternative therapies.

Contact information for the AVMA is below. Remember that the vote is tomorrow (Saturday, January 5), so if you want to weigh in, you should do it via email, phone or fax right away:

  • Email address: info@avma.org
  • Phone number: 800-248-2862
  • Fax number: 847-925-1329

Let the AVMA hear from you, their veterinary clients, that you will no longer do business with DVMs who refuse to consider or open their minds to alternative therapies. Let the AVMA know that with these latest resolutions, they are no longer serving clients who want the ability to seek out a variety of healing modalities for their pets. And let them know that ultimately, their members will lose income as pet owners turn to other types of practitioners for their holistic pet care needs.

I would add that it is also very important for those of you who believe in the benefits of alternative veterinary medicine to support your local holistic vet, if you have one in your area.

Dr. Jean also encourages any traditional DVMs who aren’t willing to close the door entirely on all complementary and alternative therapies to contact the AVMA personally and voice your concerns.

With a vote tomorrow, we have very little time to weigh in on the anti-homeopathy resolution, so please take a few minutes right now to email, call or fax a letter to the AVMA and voice your concerns about this latest resolution and what seems to be a dangerous trend toward killing off the practice of holistic veterinary medicine altogether.

My thanks to Dr. Jean Hofve for her time today and for all the work she has done toward trying to defeat both the anti-raw food and now the anti-homeopathy AVMA resolutions.

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695

 

Health And Wellness Report

Holistic Health  :  Nutrition – Diseases – Pet Health

Should Any Dog Food Formula EVER Have Corn Starch as the Main Ingredient?

Dog Food

By Dr. Becker

I ran across a couple of trade journal articles recently about the benefits of low-fat diets for dogs with GI disease. One was titled Low-fat petfood may benefit dogs with gastrointestinal disease, and the other was very similar: The Benefit of Low Fat Pet Food in Dogs with GI Disease.

Since I focus so heavily on nutrition with my dog and cat patients, I dove right in.

The condition the articles primarily focused on was hypertriglyceridemia-related GI disease (hypertriglyceridemia means there is a high blood triglyceride level).

The articles went on at some length about hypertriglyceridemia, and studies of miniature schnauzers (a breed prone to the condition) in which the condition was managed by switching the dogs to a low-fat diet.

The author of one article also briefly mentioned the GI diseases pancreatitis and severe gastroenteritis, including inflammatory bowel disease, with or without protein-losing enteropathy (loss of plasma proteins into the GI tract). He went on to assert that:

Even though patients do not have hypertriglyceridemia, they cannot appropriately deal with the normal amount of fat in the pet food and require the feeding of a low-fat food and the avoidance of fat-containing treats.

To be honest I found these articles confusing, since I was expecting a broader discussion of GI diseases (many of which are much more common than the abdominal symptoms seen in cases of hypertriglyceridemia) and the benefits of low-fat diets.

Indirect Advertising for a New Commercial Low-Fat Diet for Dogs with GI Disorders

Then I reached the end of one of the articles and noticed it had been “underwritten” by a manufacturer of prescription pet food diets.

Curious, I did a little more digging and uncovered the fact that the “underwriter” of the article had recently launched a new prescription low-fat dog food marketed as helpful in restoring the GI tract.

I went looking for more information on this newly released formula and found it easily. It is indeed low in fat at 7.4 percent per cup on a dry matter basis. However, the first five ingredients in the formula are:

  • Corn starch
  • Brewers rice
  • Corn gluten meal
  • Whole grain wheat
  • Chicken by-product meal

The only animal product in this diet is well down the ingredient list at number 5 and it’s one of the lowest quality animal proteins available, chicken-by-product meal. AAFCO’s definition:

Chicken by-product meal consists of the dry, ground, rendered, clean parts of the carcass of slaughtered chicken, such as necks, feet, undeveloped eggs and intestines — exclusive of feathers except in such amounts as might occur unavoidable in good processing practices.

The first four ingredients (meaning there are more of those ingredients in the formula than even rendered chicken pieces-and-parts), are low-grade fillers that are also notoriously allergenic.

No matter what ails your beloved canine companion, you can certainly do much better than this at mealtime.

The Truth Is, Most Dogs Don’t Need Low-Fat Diets

There are actually only a few situations in which dogs may need a low-fat diet:

  • Dogs with pancreatitis or dogs prone to the condition
  • Dogs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) due to damage to the pancreas
  • Some dogs with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
  • Dogs with hyperlipidemia or hypertriglyceridemia that can lead to pancreatitis
  • Dogs with an intolerance for dietary fat or malabsorption issues

It’s not a bad idea to try a low-fat diet with any dog with GI issues to see if the situation improves.

However, I don’t recommend the vast majority of commercially available low-fat pet foods on the market, and that includes the prescription and therapeutic diets sold by veterinary clinics, as well as vegetarian and vegan formulas. Most don’t have sufficient protein or good quality protein, and are high in grain-based carbs and other non-nutritious fillers.

For Dogs That Do Need a Low-Fat Diet …

As a general rule, the following fat content guidelines apply:

  • Food with less than 10 percent fat on a dry matter basis (less than 17 percent of calories from fat) is considered low fat.
  • Food with 10 to 15 percent fat (between 17 and 23 percent of calories from fat) is considered to contain moderate fat.
  • Food with over 20 percent fat is considered high in fat.

It is very rare that a dog will need an extremely low-fat diet. Such diets are almost always nutritionally inadequate. The National Research Council (NRC) recommends a minimum of 5 percent fat on a dry matter basis (10 percent calories from fat) for adult dogs.

Lower fat meats to consider — whether you’re preparing your dog’s meals at home or buying commercially available formulas — include skinless chicken breasts, turkey, venison, goat, buffalo and rabbit. Lamb and pork are generally high in fat. Ground beef and other cuts of red meat vary in fat content.

I recommend you work with a holistic vet to design a nutrition plan – homemade, commercially prepared, or a combination – to meet the individual needs of a dog who requires a low-fat diet either short or long-term.

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695

Health And Wellness Report

 

Holistic Health  :  Medical Research – Pet Health

 

 

Laser Therapy is Good Medicine

Laser Treatment

By Dr. Becker

Laser is actually an acronym for “light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.” Laser beams are different from other light sources in that they provide focused energy that produces small points of intense power.

The light from a laser can cauterize (burn), cut and destroy tissue in a very precise manner. Used at lower power, called low-level laser therapy, lasers have the ability to alter the function of cells without heat and without destroying those cells. This is known as biostimulation, and it can be used to treat a variety of conditions affecting the joints, nerves and soft tissue in animals.

In recent years, use of lasers in both human and veterinary medicine has increased in the treatment of conditions that were once managed only with drugs and surgery. In many situations, laser procedures are much less invasive than the traditional therapies they replace. They can also reduce or eliminate the need for drugs in certain cases.

So when it comes to laser therapy for animals, why is a perfectly legitimate healing modality still considered by some to be trickery perpetrated primarily by the holistic veterinary community on gullible pet owners and animal caretakers?

Misconception #1: There’s a lack of reliable research on the effectiveness of laser therapy

One reason for this mistaken belief is a history of negative published studies on laser therapy since its discovery over 50 years ago. This is primarily due to the incorrect use of laser equipment affecting study outcomes. Several parameters, including dosing and laser output testing, have significant bearing on the results achieved.

Fortunately, the World Association for Laser Therapy now provides standards for the design and execution of clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. A systematic review is an examination of all available high-quality research evidence relevant to a specific research question. Systematic reviews of high-quality randomized controlled trials are essential to the advancement of evidence-based medicine.

Meta-analysis is a statistical technique used to combine findings from independent studies, for example, combining data from two or more randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of a particular healthcare technique. The purpose of meta-analyses is to provide an accurate estimate of the effect of a specific treatment.

Another criticism of laser research is that it is of poor quality and can’t be used to establish the effectiveness of laser therapy.

This may have been the case at one time, but no longer. A number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated the benefit of laser treatment for a variety of conditions. These include pain and stiffness caused by osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis1, neck2 and shoulder3 pain, tennis elbow4, Achilles tendinitis5, and inflammation/ulceration of the lining of the digestive tract caused by chemotherapy.

Misconception #2: No guidelines exist on how to perform laser treatments

Along with the misperception that there’s a lack of credible research on the use of lasers, another criticism is that no guidelines are in place for treatment, making it a guessing game to determine the right laser dose.

The World Association of Laser Therapy has published a list of recommended treatment doses for a number of pain problems. And while the recommended treatments are for humans, they are derived from clinical trials and studies on animals with similar pathologies.

The recommendations for veterinary use of lasers are closely aligned with these guidelines.

In addition, laser therapy clinical trials are being conducted at some veterinary schools. Colorado State University is conducting a randomized, controlled clinical trial on laser treatment for snake bites in dogs.

At the University of Florida, researchers completed a study on laser therapy for dogs with intervertebral disk disease. Study results showed that after a spinal cord injury and surgery, dogs who received laser therapy walked sooner, had no medical complications, and were discharged earlier. In fact, the results were so dramatic they are now using lasers with every dog presenting with that condition.

Misconception #3: Laser treatment is nothing more than expensive heat therapy

Another argument against laser treatments is that they are nothing more than very expensive heat therapy. This is simply incorrect.

Not all lasers warm the tissue and perceptions of heat being applied depend on equipment settings. In any event, heat isn’t how lasers heal. They heal by creating a photochemical reaction in tissue known as photobiomodulation. Photobiomodulation describes the changes that occur after light enters mitochondria and triggers beneficial physiologic changes.

Laser therapy affects a variety of tissues in the body, including neurons. Studies in the use of lasers to promote nerve regeneration6 have shown exciting results in bringing a return of function after acute spinal cord injury in rats.

Misconception #4: There is no science to explain how laser therapy works

Finally, perhaps the weakest criticism of laser therapy is that many people, including vets who use it regularly in their practices, can’t explain the science behind it.

Many practitioners can’t explain the scientific rationale behind treatments used in traditional veterinary medicine, either — for example, corticosteroid therapy. Yet steroids, which can have significant long-term side effects, are prescribed every day by MD’s and DVM’s.

The science of laser therapy is available. It’s just difficult for some to grasp – especially when the drugs-and-surgery medical model is all that is taught in the majority of vet schools.

As more veterinary schools expand their curriculums to include laser therapy training, more DVM’s will come around. Lasers, properly applied and dosed, provide significant benefits and expand veterinarians’ options for treating patients effectively, often eliminating or reducing the need for surgery or drugs.

 

 

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695

Food Safety

Pet Health

Grieving pet owners take jerky treat fight to the stores

Rita Desollar

Rita Desollar of Pekin, Ill., has launched a petition calling for retail stores to stop selling chicken jerky pet treats from China. She believes her 8-year-old dog, Heidi, died in May after eating tainted treats.

By JoNel Aleccia, NBC News

Rita Desollar’s black minivan has become a rolling warning about the possible dangers of chicken jerky pet treats from China.

Everywhere the 57-year-old Pekin, Ill., woman goes, her car carries a poster detailing the May death of her 8-year-old German shepherd, Heidi.

Desollar says she gave the dog two pieces of Waggin’ Train chicken jerky tenders on a Wednesday and by the next Monday, Heidi was dead.

“I didn’t know what it was. I just couldn’t figure out what made her so sick,” said Desollar, who turned to the computer for answers. “It was breathtaking what came up.”

Desollar found dozens of news stories and blog accounts detailing government cautions about possible links between Chinese-made chicken jerky treats and illnesses and deaths in hundreds of U.S. dogs.

Manufacturers have issued no recalls for the products and Food and Drug Administration officials say repeated testing and investigation has revealed no contaminants that would lead the agency to advise pulling the treats.

But Desollar said she never saw any warnings and didn’t know about a potential problem — until it was too late.

Outraged, the retired paralegal said she had no choice but to take matters into her own hands.

“They’re leaving a product on the shelf that can potentially harm a dog. There was no warning. There was nothing to tell me this was under investigation. They just left it out there.”

She launched a Change.org petition Sept. 5 calling for stores to pull the products voluntarily; since then it has gathered more than 60,000 signatures. She stuck the fliers on her car and ordered magnets that say “Stop the Cycle of Death,” along with hundreds of business cards that say “Beware… Chicken Duck and Sweet Potato JERKY TREATS are not safe!”

“I leave the cards on the shelves by the dangerous treats everywhere I see them,” she said. “I have distributed over 1,500 of these cards to date and I have another order of 1,000 on the way.”

Desollar is not alone. Across the U.S., some pet owners — frustrated by what they say is a lack of government or industry action to get dangerous treats off the market —  have started warning others themselves.

Retailers, pet treat manufacturers and FDA officials all say that there’s no confirmed connection between the Chinese-made jerky treats and pet harm, despite reports of at least 2,200 illnesses and deaths of 360 dogs and 1 cat blamed on the products since 2007.

“This is a very complex public health investigation,” the FDA’s Steven Solomon, a veterinarian and deputy associate commissioner of compliance policy, told NBC News this week. “The tests have not demonstrated significant toxicants.”

Another FDA official, Tracy DuVernoy of the agency’s Coordinated Response and Evaluation Network, told a gathering of veterinarians this summer that the complaints should be put in perspective.

“Two thousand complaints since 2007 is an incredibly small subset of the 15 million animals estimated to consume these treats,” she said, according to an account of the American Veterinary Medical Association conference. “Therefore, it seems that this may very well be some sort of intermittent issue, or it might just be an idiosyncratic reaction within that individual animal.”

Officials with Nestle Purina PetCare Co., which sells the popular Waggin’ Train and Canyon Creek brands of treats, have repeatedly said that internal testing has found no problems with their product and that the treats are safe to feed as directed.

But that hasn’t stopped consumers like Susan Nichols, 64, of Grand Blanc, Mich. She believes that jerky treats caused kidney failure in her 11-year-old Cocker spaniel-dachshund mix, Lucy, last year. So she printed up fliers that she surreptitiously leaves in stores where the products are sold.

“If I’m in Walmart or wherever, I will take my little Scotch tape out of my purse and tape it there,” she said. “It’s just a little thing I do. I’ll just slap one up.”

Jeff Zolman

Jeff Zolman, 42, of Aurora, Colo., said his 9-year-old dog, Bandit, died after eating chicken jerky treats. He asked to put up fliers at a local store, but was turned down.

In Aurora, Colo., Jeff Zolman, 42, was so distraught about the death of his 9-year-old dog, Bandit, that he, too, made posters with the dog’s picture and headed to the Big Lots store where he bought the treats he believes led to her death.

“The manager said he couldn’t post anything up unless it came from corporate,” said Zolman. “I understand where he’s coming from, but I wanted to get it out there for other people.”

Despite such consumer passion, retailers across the country have resisted calls to remove the pet treats from commerce, saying they need more than anecdotal reports to justify the action.

“We’re really sticking with the science at this point,” said Craig Wilson, vice president of food safety and quality assurance at Costco, one of seven stores specifically targeted in Desollar’s petition.

The chain is known for its aggressive food safety monitoring system, which includes stringent tests on jerky treats, Wilson said. So far, repeated examinations have revealed no contaminants that can be linked to reports of animal illness, including kidney failure and Fanconi syndrome.

“I don’t think people understand how hard Costco looks at this,” he said. “If there’s a hole in this boat, I’d like to be the guy who finds it.”

The other stores named in Desollar’s petition include Walmart, Sam’s Club, Target, Safeway, Kroger and Walgreens.

An official with Target noted that the jerky treats are the subject of ongoing lawsuits and said the company could not respond. Several consumers have sued the manufacturers and sellers of the jerky treats in lawsuits filed from California to Connecticut.

Officials with Kroger and Walgreens said those stores abide by FDA guidance on the jerky treat issue.

“If the FDA determines that these or any products are potentially unsafe, they would contact us and we would immediately pull the product,” Kroger spokesman Keith Dailey said in an email to NBC News.

Dianna Gee, a spokeswoman for Walmart, added that in addition to FDA standards, that firm requires pet treats to meet requirements of the Global Food Safety Initiative. She said the firm was not aware that any consumers had left behind fliers or cards protesting the treats, but she said shoppers with questions about the products should consult the manufacturers, the FDA or a Walmart manager.

Officials with Safeway did not respond to NBC News phone calls and emails.

One store not named in the latest petition, PetSmart, said in a statement that the firm is monitoring FDA and manufacturer guidance. “At this time, we have no immediate plans to remove product from shelves,” they said.

The efforts of Desollar and others may pay off, said Tony Corbo, a lobbyist for the group Food & Water Watch.

“Consumer pressure can be instrumental in getting these treats out of the marketplace,” he said.

“The easiest way to get them out of commerce is for FDA to issue an import alert against these products.”

For their part, FDA officials said they’re continuing to investigate the production processes at the Chinese plants that make chicken jerky and other types of jerky products. A small number of complaints also have cited duck and yam jerky treats.

Inspections of five Chinese plants in April yielded valuable information that has led to increased surveillance, said Solomon. Next month, FDA inspectors will visit Chinese plants that irradiate finished jerky treat products to investigate whether that process is tied to the reports of illness and death. Officials are also examining the sources of glycerin used by the Chinese manufacturers to make the treats.

Desollar is glad that the government is continuing to look into the problem. But she said she’ll continue to take personal action to warn fellow pet owners about the possible danger.

“The FDA is a huge government office,” she said. “Purina is a huge corporation. I can’t walk into the FDA and say, ‘Do something.’ But I can walk into Kroger and say, ‘These treats killed my dog.’”

Related stories: 

Health And Wellness Report

 

 

 

Health  :  Pet Health

 

 

Uploaded by on Feb 6, 2012

http://healthypets.mercola.com/ An integrative wellness veterinarian Dr. Karen Becker documented the whole entire saga with regards to tick-borne disease.

The Very Best Way to Protect Your Pet from Ticks

By Dr. Becker

Last year around this time I had quite a battle with tick exposure with my own dogs, Violet, her brother Esau, his mate Ada, and my little Boston terrier, Rosco.

I thought I would share the entire saga with you, since summer is upon us once again and it’s shaping up to be an extra bad year for pests and parasites. Hopefully, I’ll provide some helpful information to those of you with pets that have tested positive for a tick-borne disease … or might before the season is over.

The Adventure Begins: Violet Tests Positive for Lyme Disease

The adventure began with our dog Violet, who tested positive for Lyme disease according to the blood tests I run frequently on my pets.

We ran a SNAP 4Dx test on Violet’s blood, and the good news was she was negative for heartworm, Ehrlichia, and anaplasmosis. But she was positive for Lyme – meaning she had at least been exposed to it. So the next test I needed to run was a Lyme quantitative C6 antibody test, which differentiates between exposure and infection.

Most dogs exposed to Lyme-positive ticks are able to fight off the infection on their own. I didn’t want to use antibiotics unnecessarily, but I did want to make sure Violet was fighting off infection.

When I got home the evening of Violet’s Lyme-positive test result, I drew blood from her for the C6 antibody test, and I also drew blood from her brother, Esau, and our Boston terrier, Rosco, to check organ function and run the SNAP 4Dx on each of them.

Rosco passed all his tests with flying colors. No Lyme disease, no heartworm or other parasites, and he had the organs of a 4 year-old (even though he was 11 at the time).

Next up for a blood draw was Ada, who is Esau’s mate (no worries, no litters!). Because I’m a proactive vet, I check the status of my own pets’ health every six months. And as you can see, things can certainly change in just a short six-month period, as in the case of Violet.

Next Problem: Esau Has Anemia and a Low Platelet Count

Fortunately, Violet’s C6 test came back negative for Lyme, which means she was only exposed but not infected.

Ada tested negative for all tick-borne diseases and her organ function was fine.

Esau also tested negative for all tick-borne diseases per the SNAP 4Dx. But unfortunately, his platelets were low and he was anemic. Not good news for our Esau.

A low platelet count and anemia indicates either a consumption problem or a platelet production problem in the bone marrow. Either his bone marrow isn’t producing platelets, or his body is consuming them at a higher than normal rate. This can be something really scary — like internal bleeding, or maybe a tumor on his spleen. Hemangiosarcoma, which is a type of spleen cancer, causes low platelet counts.

But thinking positively, it could also be Rocky Mountain spotted fever, which is the most likely cause, actually, of slight anemia and a low platelet count. Rocky Mountain spotted fever is yet another tick-borne disease that we don’t routinely test for. Fortunately, it’s treatable and curable … unlike most spleen tumors.

So I drew more blood from Esau to send out for a Rocky Mountain spotted fever test.

Esau’s Diagnosis: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Esau tested positive for Rocky Mountain spotted fever. The etiologic agent is Rickettsia rickettsii. This particular organism is transmitted by American dog ticks and lone star ticks.

The good news is Esau’s condition was totally treatable. He didn’t have any visible symptoms other than slightly pale gums. No petechial hemorrhages and no lethargy.

This is a great example of proactive medicine at work. Because I test my pets’ blood every six months, I was able to spot a problem with anemia and a low platelet count in Esau. That led me to do the second test for Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and based on those results, I was able to completely resolve the condition before it created any problems for my dog.

Why Tick-borne Disease is Reaching Epidemic Proportions

There are several reasons, in my professional opinion, for the epidemic of tick-borne diseases we’re experiencing across the U.S.

First of all, ticks are resilient little suckers. They were once only a problem in certain areas of the country, but now they are being found across the U.S., which means they are expanding their home turf.

I’m also very concerned about pesticide resistance in ticks. For the last 50 years, we have seen progressively more toxic options for tick control. Dogs are getting monthly doses of chemicals year after year … and yet they’re still testing positive for tick-borne diseases.

Although chemical preventives may reduce the sheer number of ticks that attach to a dog, those ticks that do attach still carry disease. It’s a given the pesticides we’re applying at unprecedented rates to our dogs are causing resistance in parasites, and yet they are not one hundred percent effective at preventing tick attachment or disease transmission.

Another reason tick-borne diseases are on the rise is that insects other than ticks – specifically mosquitoes — have been found to transmit some of these potentially lethal infections.

Screening Tests for Tick-borne Infections Should Be Done Routinely

Fortunately, more vets are routinely screening for tick-borne diseases these days, which is allowing for earlier detection and treatment. I now routinely test at-risk dogs for tick-borne diseases twice a year.

Last year, in addition to my own pets having issues, we saw dozens of patients that also tested positive on routine screening. Most shocking was the fact that only a few owners of those dogs could recall finding a tick on their pet.

Just because a dog tests positive on the initial screening test for tick-borne disease doesn’t mean she must immediately be treated. In fact, most dogs successfully clear their own infections without the need for medical intervention. For this reason, I don’t recommend automatically giving antibiotics to positive dogs.

If your pet tests positive, I recommend you insist that your vet do additional testing to find out whether he has just been exposed or is actually dealing with an infection.

I live and work in the Midwest. Many pets, including my own, spend a significant amount of time outside during the warm summer months. This of course leads to a greater risk of tick attachment. But your dog can still be at risk even if he doesn’t spend a lot of time outside, so I still recommend you have your dog checked for tick-borne diseases with a SNAP 4Dx test, or a newer test by Antech called Accuplex.

Because tick-borne diseases are occurring at epidemic rates, and because these diseases if left undiagnosed and untreated can be lethal and really decrease a pet’s quality of life, a common-sense proactive approach is to simply ask your vet to do a simple screening test at your dog’s bi-annual wellness exam.

Lyme Disease

Lyme disease is the most well-known of the many infections ticks can transmit. Lyme is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi. The tick species that carries B. burgdorferi is the black-legged tick, also known as the deer tick.

Symptoms of Lyme disease in dogs can vary a great deal. In people, the infection causes a bull’s eye target shaped rash, but that doesn’t often happen with dogs. Warning signs of an infection may not appear until the disease has caused a significant amount of degeneration in your dog’s body.

Symptoms can also be intermittent. They can be initially vague, leading you or your vet to believe your pet is simply having a few “off” days. You might see a mild decrease in appetite … perhaps a mild lameness … maybe a swollen joint or a mild fever for a few days. These are all things we expect to see at one time or another in a dog’s life, and don’t necessarily assign much significance to them.

Because Lyme disease is found throughout the U.S., if you think your dog is just not up to par and has one or more of the mild symptoms I just listed, I recommend you ask your vet to check for Lyme disease.

If the disease goes undetected it can lead to kidney failure and terrible polyarthritis that can absolutely ruin your dog’s quality of life.

Many dogs’ immune systems clear Lyme infection on their own without the need for antibiotics or other treatment. If your dog does test positive for Lyme, please insist on the quantitative C6 follow-up test I mentioned earlier. The C6 will differentiate true infection from exposure.

Only if your dog is truly infected should he be treated with antibiotics. If your dog needs a course of antibiotics, be sure to supplement with a probiotic at the same time. I also recommend you continue the probiotic for at least a month after antibiotic therapy to avoid GI problems.

Ehrlichiosis

Canine ehrlichiosis is another tick-borne disease caused by two bacteria. One is Ehrlichia canis, which is transmitted by the brown dog tick and is found most frequently in the southwest and Gulf Coast states. The other is Ehrlichia ewingii, which is transmitted by the lone star tick and can be found from the Midwest to New England.

Like other tick-borne diseases, ehrlichia can wreak havoc on your dog’s body if it’s not identified and treated. Symptoms can be vague – loss of appetite, a low-grade fever, lethargy, maybe a swollen lymph node or two. Sometimes there are more noticeable symptoms such as unexplained bruising, lameness or nosebleeds.

A diagnosis can be confirmed with a blood test called a PCR. If your dog tests positive on the screening test for ehrlichia, you can request a second PCR test to confirm infection.

Anaplasmosis

Canine anaplasmosis is caused by the bacteria Anaplasma phagocytophilum or Anaplasma platys. The infection is transmitted by the deer tick or the brown dog tick, both of which are found throughout the U.S.

Infected dogs can run a high fever and sometimes they lose their appetite. There can be GI symptoms like vomiting and diarrhea. There are sometimes neurologic signs or neck pain. Symptoms can also be as serious as seizures or anemia.

If your dog tests positive for anaplasmosis on a SNAP 4Dx test but doesn’t have anemia or other symptoms, chances are she has effectively cleared the bacteria on her own. But if her blood test shows anemia and/or she has any other symptoms, I recommend a second test  — the PCR — which will confirm anaplasmosis infection.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Rocky Mountain spotted fever in dogs is caused by the bacteria Rickettsia rickettsii. It is most commonly transmitted by the lone star tick, but can also be carried by the American dog tick and the wood tick. Despite the name “Rocky Mountain” spotted fever, the ticks that carry the disease are found throughout the U.S.

Some infected dogs have a fever, body soreness, or neurologic symptoms. Not all dogs have the spotty, patchy skin rash that is characteristic of the infection in humans.

Vets confirm a Rocky Mountain spotted fever infection by measuring the antibody titer level through a blood test.

Reducing Your Pet’s Risk of a Tick-borne Infection

How can you reduce your dog’s risk of acquiring a tick-borne disease?

    • Check for ticks daily, and don’t overlook areas of your pet’s body where ticks can hide, like between the toes, the underside of the toes, in the earflaps and around the tail base.

My dog Violet has a black skin tag and a very short coat, so everyone who sees her for the first time thinks she has a tick on her side. That’s why it’s important to know your dog’s “normals” so you can easily identify any “abnormals.” If you’re ever unsure whether you’re looking at a tick or a skin tag or other bump on your dog, get out a magnifying glass and look for the telltale sign of a tick – legs.

    • Remember that ticks must be attached to your dog for at least 24 hours in order for the disease-causing bacteria to be transmitted from the tick to your pet. That’s why daily tick checks and removing ticks immediately is a huge part of reducing your dog’s risk of acquiring a tick-borne disease.
    • If you find a tick on your dog, be sure to remove it correctly. Don’t use your bare hands. People can become infected by handling or crushing an infected tick. Either wear gloves, or even better, use a tick-removing tool.

Grasp the tick very close to your pet’s skin with our Tick Stick, a similar tick removal tool, or a pair of tweezers. Carefully pull the tick’s body away from the skin. You may pull some hair along with it, but that’s okay. The important thing is to grip the tick as close to your pet’s skin as possible. Once it’s off, flush it down the toilet.

Next, disinfect your dog’s skin with soapy water or my favorite disinfectant, diluted povidone iodine, also called Betadine. Disinfect the area really well and monitor it for the next few days. If you notice any irritation or inflammation of the skin, you should contact your veterinarian.

If you are a proactive pet owner, you’ll want to have your dog tested for tick-borne diseases about three to four weeks after removing a tick. The type of test to ask your vet for is the SNAP 4Dx test, which is a screening blood test.

If you don’t have the 4Dx test done, you’ll want to watch your dog closely for several months for any signs of loss of appetite, lethargy, changes in gait, fever, intermittent limping – all the symptoms of potential tick-borne diseases.

Unfortunately, tick-borne diseases are here to stay. Checking your dog externally for ticks and having his blood checked regularly for internal, silent infections is the very best approach to keeping your pet safe from these potentially devastating diseases.

For more information on tick-borne illness, pictures of different types of disease-carrying ticks, and maps showing the number of reported cases of tick-borne disease in your area, visit DogsandTicks.com.

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695

Health And Wellness Report

 

 

Holistic Health :  Pet Health

 

 

 

Is Every Dog a Natural Swimmer?

 

By Dr. Becker

Some people mistakenly believe all dogs have a “swimming gene” and are born with the natural ability to swim.

But the reality is that while most dogs instinctively make a paddling motion if they happen to wind up in water, it’s often the extent of their ability to swim. Not every dog paddle is effective at keeping the animal afloat, and many dogs have no idea how to move toward shore or the side of the pool.

In my experience, dogs generally fall into one of three categories when it comes to swimming. There are dogs that naturally take to the water, those who just aren’t built for the water and should stay safely ashore (unless in a hydrotherapy tank with a therapist hovering nearby), and dogs who can be taught to swim.

There are always exceptions to every rule, of course. There are dogs bred for water work who are terrified of the wet stuff. And there are those that by design shouldn’t be able to swim, but manage to anyway.

Breeds Known to Be Good Swimmers

Medium-to-large sized breeds with water-resistant coats and webbing between their toes are typically strong swimmers. These dogs have been bred for water work and include most retrievers, including the lab, the golden, and the Chesapeake Bay retriever.

Dogs with “water” in their breed names are a given. These include the Portuguese Water Dog, the Spanish Water Dog, the Irish Water Spaniel, and the American Water Spaniel.

Newfoundlands, despite their giant size, are also great swimmers. Other breeds comfortable in the water include English and Irish setters, the standard poodle, and the Schipperke.

Breeds Not Built for the Water

Dogs that aren’t designed for swimming include “top heavy” breeds – those with large chests and small hindquarters. Short muzzled dogs, including the brachycephalic breeds, and dogs with very short legs also don’t do well in water.

For example, bulldogs, dachshunds and boxers are generally not able to stay afloat. Brachy breeds like the pug tend to tire easily due to the abnormal structure of their respiratory organs.

Many small dogs can be very good swimmers, but because they get chilled easily and tend to be frightened in the water, they don’t always do so well.

Getting Your Dog Used to the Water

Go slow in the beginning. Always use a PFD (personal flotation device, or life preserver). The goal is to discover whether your dog enjoys the water and whether he has the build and aptitude for swimming. Even if your pet is a recognized swimmer like a retriever, you should never simply drop a dog who has never been in water into the pool or the lake.

Some natural swimmers need no coaxing to go into the water, but other dogs bred for swimming need to get used to the water gradually. The first time you take your dog to the lake, if she’s hesitant at the shoreline, try wading in yourself and encourage her to follow you. If she does, give her plenty of praise.

Get her used to the feel of the water in a shallow spot, then gradually work her into deeper water. If she’s moving around well and seems comfortable, you can throw a floating toy or ball or even a stick out for her to fetch. If she swims out to the object and retrieves it, call her and encourage her to swim back to you. Praise her liberally when she reaches you.

If your dog is a natural in the water, it won’t be long before she’s diving in on her own every chance she gets.

An alternative to going into the water yourself is to try bringing your pet around a group of swimming dogs. Some dogs easily get the hang of being in water in the presence of other dogs swimming around them.

If your dog isn’t a breed recognized for being good in the water, you can try introducing him very gradually, but my recommendation is to stay right with him and start out with your pet in a flotation vest. If he seems comfortable and can move around well, he’ll probably enjoy swimming. If he’s mostly scared, shivering and looking like he’d rather be anywhere else, he may need more time to get used to the water – or he may never enjoy it.

My dog Rosco (a brachycephalic Boston Terrier), instantly loved swimming, despite the fact he couldn’t respire well during the activity. We had to condition his body to the sport of recreational swimming, allowing his muscles, heart and lungs to coordinate their abilities before we took his life preserver off.

If you have a breed that isn’t physically built for swimming, my recommendation is to keep him on dry land. The water is dangerous for dogs that can’t stay afloat or tire out before they can swim to safety. If you do bring your non-swimmer to the lake or the beach or even out to your backyard pool, I recommend putting a dog flotation vest on him as we did with Rosco, until we knew he was able to swim without risk.

Safety First

Even Michael Phelps tires out, so don’t be overconfident that your pet can handle anything in the water. Even the best canine swimmer can get very tired – especially in deep water. Older dogs and puppies tire more easily than adult dogs, and special care must be taken not to let them overdo it.

If you take your dog boating, no matter how great she is in the water, I recommend you use a dog flotation vest except for those times when the boat is anchored for swimming – and you’re keeping an eye on her. Dogs can fall into the water unnoticed, and if you’re at cruising speed, by the time you realize your pet isn’t onboard, it could be too late to save her. A flotation vest will help her stay on top of the water and will also help you spot her more easily.

If your dog is swimming in unfamiliar water, beware of strong currents, steep drop-offs, and any other potential dangers that could pull your pet under or sweep her away before you can get to her.

For Canine Landlubbers

Even if your dog isn’t built for the water or just doesn’t like it, he can still hang out at the lake or around the pool with you as long as you take some precautions.

Make sure he’s in a flotation vest just in case, has plenty of cool, clean water to drink, access to shade, and can walk around without burning the bottoms of his feet. If he starts to heat up, fill a container with water and gently pour it over him, starting at the back of the neck and working toward the tail. Then have him roll onto his back and drench his belly in cool water as well.

Whether your dog is on land or on the water, be alert for signs of heatstroke.

 

 

 

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695

Health And Wellness Report

 

 

 

Pet Health :  Holistic Health / Food Safety

 

 

 

 

If You Feed Sweet Potato Treats to Your Pet, Please Read This!

 

By Dr. Becker

It seems there’s another dog snack from China to worry about: sweet potato treats.

According to the Veterinary Information Network (VIN) 1, vets are now reporting health problems linked to sweet potato treats similar to those related to chicken jerky treats also made in China.

Test results on sick dogs show kidney problems similar to the symptoms of Fanconi syndrome. Most dogs recover, but there have been some deaths related to the chicken jerky treat problem.

Symptoms may show up within hours or days after a treat is eaten and include decreased appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, and increased thirst and urination.

If you’ve fed your dog either chicken jerky treats or sweet potato treats made in China and your pet has fallen ill, I recommend you contact your veterinarian – especially if the symptoms persist for more than 24 hours or are severe.

Pet Treats You May Want to Avoid

The brands allegedly implicated in the sweet potato treat problem are:

  • Beefeaters Sweet Potato Snacks for Dogs (16 varieties of yam-related treats)
  • Canyon Creek Ranch Chicken Yam Good Dog Treats (Nestlé Purina)
  • Dogswell Veggie Life Vitality (4 varieties)

Keep in mind that although the problem treats are often identified as “jerky” treats, they also go by a host of other names, including tenders, strips, chips, wraps, twists, and several others.

Per Poisoned Pets 2, in 2010 the FDA found that a sweet potato dog treat made by a certain company in China was contaminated with phorate, a highly toxic pesticide.

There is speculation there could be problems with pork treats and cat treats imported from China as well.

For more information on why you need to be vigilant about reading pet food labels, making phone calls to manufacturers, and really doing your homework on what you’re feeding your dog or cat, read my article Pet Food and China – More Cause for Concern?

If You Feed Your Pet Commercially Prepared Treats …

PLEASE know that if you choose to buy any treat made in China, your pet may be at risk. Chicken jerky treats, chicken tenders, chicken strips, chicken treats or sweet potato treats, they can all pose a potential threat. Play it safe. Buy only food and treats made in the U.S. Buying pet food made in this country won’t remove all risk of winding up with a tainted product, but it will certainly improve your chances of keeping your pet safe.

Consider making your own sweet potato treats at home. Try to buy produce locally and make sure to wash the sweet potatoes or yams thoroughly. Then slice them nice and thin, arrange on a baking sheet, and cook in a 300º oven for about 45 minutes. Let the slices cool and store them in plastic bags.

For homemade chicken jerky treats, buy some boneless chicken breasts, clean them, and slice into long, thin strips – the thinner the better. Place the strips on a greased or non-stick cookie sheet and bake them for at least three hours at 180 degrees. The low temp dries the chicken out slowly and the strips wind up nice and chewy. Let the strips cool, and then store them in plastic bags or another airtight container. You can also freeze them.

Update:

We have removed the reference to Drs. Foster and Smith.  We also included a message from their organization.  Drs. Foster and Smith products were not implicated in this problem.

 

Statement from Drs. Foster and Smith

There has been a lot of discussion lately on the internet regarding dog treats made in China. The FDA has been monitoring this situation and performing a battery of tests. Their web site is the most reliable source of information on this. Much of the other discussion on the internet, including some “reports”, is based on speculation rather than facts.

The FDA has not issued any report that identifies any of the Drs. Foster and Smith treats as being the cause of an illness in animals. The latest information from FDA is that after running many tests on products from multiple manufacturers for many harmful substances, they still cannot establish any link between any cases of illness in animals and treats from China. We are continuing to watch this situation closely.

Please be assured that our goal at Doctors Foster and Smith is to provide pet products of only the highest quality. The treat products we receive from China come from companies that we have worked with for many years. These companies hold quality and safety certifications from many US and European inspection agencies, and are frequently inspected by our representatives from the United States to assure they are following proper safety and quality control practices. For those people who wish to buy US-manufactured products, we carry many products made in the United States. Our dry and canned pet foods are made in the US. Many of our Doctors Foster and Smith treats are also made in the United States- for example our Premium Natural Biscuits are made here in Wisconsin. We also carry, under other labels, some chicken jerky and other treats made in the US.

References:


 

 

 

Call Toll Free: 877-985-2695